Almost for as long as there has been
food, there have been ways of depicting it that seek to bring out its best
qualities. One only needs to look at the still life paintings from many
centuries ago of artists like Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, to appreciate
where today's food
photographer - like Graham Precey of Precey.com (http://www.precey.com) - derives inspiration.
These painters were concerned with
so many of the aesthetic aspects that today's food and drink photographers now
use to considerable advantage, including composition and light, as well as
allegory, which might be thought to have fallen out of favour. That is not to
suggest, however, that today's food
and drink photography does not reflect an interest in meaning, with certain
foods remaining synonymous with certain social classes, lifestyles and
aspirations.
In a time long before photography,
some of the world's most renowned painters were eager to highlight their
technical panache and ability to arrange items, in the depiction of naturally
beautiful food. The realism of these portrayals of food mark them out as real
predecessors to today's more commercial
photography. Then, as now, so much of the point of such depictions was to
make the viewer salivate, and feel that they shared a room with the food.
It is thought that food in art dates
back to the ancient Egyptian era, when its representation in tombs reflected a
belief in its availability in the afterlife. The Romans, meanwhile, had a
penchant for decorative mosaics that flaunted the food of the upper class. However,
when food photography finally came into being in the 19th century, it was still
life paintings that exerted the greatest influence.
Early 20th century food photography
was characterised by experimentation with repetition, diagonals, close-ups and
cropping. But by the latter half of the century, food photography had largely
become full-blown commercial and advertising
photography, used by manufacturers throughout cookbooks and magazines.
In the process, there wasn't always
much respect shown for the most natural appearance of food, the '60s and '70s
being the era in which one would add shine with a toxic product like glycerine,
or perhaps keep morsels rooted to the spot with hairspray, or even simulate the
'straight from the oven' look with cigarette smoke. Even better known was the
widespread substitution of milk for glue.
Back then, in an era of 4x5 film
cameras with long exposures, the lighting techniques used resulted in a
consistent, rather than imaginative look. Flash and tungsten were in vogue, and
in-focus topshots were favoured over all other formats. It's a far cry from the
present fashion for much more natural, albeit still appetising food photography
that reflects the skill of the cook.
Today, Graham Precey of Precey.com (http://www.precey.com) is a leading food photographer in London
showing the possibilities of this art form in the early 21st century. Contact
him at his studio in the capital to learn more about how he can provide the
highest standard of photography for your own organisation's requirements.
Editor’s
Note: Precey.com (http://www.precey.com) are
represented by the search engine advertising and digital marketing specialists
Jumping Spider Media. Email: info@jumpingspidermedia.co.uk or call: +44 (0)20 3070 1959
/ +34 952 783 637.
No comments:
Post a Comment